Controversy Surrounds Bayelsa United’s Shirt Sponsorship Deal
The recent announcement of a new shirt sponsorship deal between Bayelsa United and Halkin Exploration and Production Limited for the 2023/24 Nigerian Premier Football League season has sparked significant controversy. The Bayelsa State Government has publicly expressed its disapproval of the deal, unequivocally stating that it was neither sanctioned nor endorsed by the government for the ongoing football season.
The deal with Halkin Exploration and Production Limited has garnered attention due to the company’s involvement in the alleged acquisition of Oil Mining Lease 46 (OML 46), also known as the Atala Oilfield, which is the property of the Bayelsa State government. Governor Douye Diri has vehemently opposed the revocation of the OML 46 license by the defunct Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) in April 2020, underscoring the oilfield’s significance as a valuable asset of the state.
In a statement issued by the governor’s Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Daniel Alabrah, it was explicitly outlined that the reports of the kitting deal were misleading and falsely suggested the governor’s consent. Governor Diri maintained his support for private sector investment in sports but emphasized the imperative of due diligence and due process in such arrangements.
The statement quoted the governor as expressing surprise and dismay over the reports of the sponsorship deal, clarifying that he was not cognizant of any such agreement involving Bayelsa United and Halkin Exploration and Production Limited. Governor Diri directed the Commissioner for Youth and Sports Development, Daniel Igali, and the Bayelsa United Chairman, Ebiki Timitimi, to immediately cease the process pending a comprehensive investigation into the matter.
Preliminary investigations have indicated that due diligence and necessary approvals from relevant authorities were disregarded in the deal. The government has cautioned its boards, agencies, and parastatals, urging them to desist from acting unilaterally on state matters to avert undesirable consequences.
The controversy surrounding the shirt sponsorship deal underscores the critical significance of transparency and adherence to proper procedures in such agreements. The involvement of a company with contentious ties to the state’s oil assets has raised concerns about the ethical and legal implications of the partnership.
As the investigation unfolds, it is imperative for all parties involved to adhere to the principles of accountability and integrity. The outcome of the inquiry will undeniably have profound implications for both Bayelsa United and Halkin Exploration and Production Limited, as well as the wider landscape of sports sponsorship in the Nigerian Premier Football League.
In conclusion, the unfolding events serve as a poignant reminder of the requisite responsible governance and ethical business practices in the realm of sports partnerships. They stand as a testament to the vigilance of the Bayelsa State Government in safeguarding the interests of the state and its football team, Bayelsa United.
